Food production is the largest cause of global environmental change. The debate on sustainable agriculture focuses largely on the implementation of new agricultural techniques. The impact of these techniques on agricultural landscapes is not often considered. With the film ‘Tussen de kassen’, I attempt to shift the current debate in a direction that allows consideration of the aesthetic and systemic consequences of the implementation of agricultural techniques on specific landscapes. ‘Tussen de kassen’ examines an innovative and sustainable landscape of greenhouse horticulture. More than a tool to communicate research or annotate site visits, film and filmmaking functioned as architectural carpentry. Meaning that the complete process of filmmaking (including preliminary site visits, editing, etc.) functioned as an unconventional method of knowledge production for an architectural research project.
Using ‘Tussen de Kassen’, I illustrate three ways in which filmmaking as architectural carpentry benefits the work of landscape architects whilst examining modern landscapes of food production; As a tool to explore and examine the atmospheres of agricultural landscapes (1) Film is able to convey synaesthetic properties of a landscape. These are properties that belong to multiple sensory fields at once and play a part in generating ‘atmosphere’, the meaning a person assigns unconsciously and almost instantaneously to a space. Film allows viewers to explore the synaesthetic properties behind this initial atmosphere and (re-) examine their subconsciously assigned meanings to space.
As a method to explore unexpected entanglements in food production landscapes (2) The (architectural) medium used to analyse a site determines the understanding of that site. Filmmaking demands close engagement with a site, making the filmmaker a participant of the landscape. This results in unexpected discoveries of entanglements between agricultural techniques and other site aspects.
As a form of eidetic storytelling for landscapes of the Anthropocene (3) Narrating the functioning and conception of Anthropocenic landscapes in a causal, linear manner is problematic as it leads to ‘undecidability’ and inaction. Film, as an eidetic storytelling tool, combines different types of information (i.e. visual, acoustic, quantifiable, metaphoric, etc.) to mediate multivalent, openended and non-linear narratives for Anthropocenic landscapes.
Cover image: Stills from ‘Tussen de Kassen’
References
AMO and Koolhaas, Rem. Countryside, A Report. Köln: TASCHEN, 2020
Burton, Emily and Marume, Upenyu. “The broiler chicken as a signal of a human reconfigured biosphere” Royal Society Open Science (December 12, 2018) https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180325
Benning, James. “Sogobi.” Sierra Nevada: ALIVE, 2002
Böhme, Gernot. “Atmosphere as the fundamental concept of a new aesthetics.” Thesis eleven, critical theory and historical sociology vol. 36 (1993): p. 113-126
Bogost, Ian. Alien Phenomenology, or What It’s Like to Be a Thing. Minneapolis: University Of Minnesota Press, 2012
Brennan, Maeve. “Listening in the Dark.” 2018
Bruno, Giuliana. Atlas of Emotion. New York: Verso, 2002
Bubant, Nils. “Haunted Geologies: spirits, stones and the necropolitics of the anthropocene.” Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet: Ghosts and Monsters of the Anthropocene edited by Tsing, Anna. Swanson, Heather. Gan, Elaine. Bubandt, Nils. p.121-141. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2017
Corner, James. “Eidetic operations and new landscapes.” Recovering Landscape edited by Corner, James. p.153-169. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1999
Christiaanse, Kees. “Green urbanism. Models of a dense and green urban context” Textbook edited by Christiaanse, Kees. and Bridger, Jessica. p.162-178. Rotterdam: nai010, 2018
Girot, Christophe. “Landscape: Beyond the margins of vision.” Emerging Landscapes : Between Production and Representation. edited by Deriu, D. Kamvasinou, K. and Shinkle, E. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd, 2015
Haraway, Donna. Staying with the trouble. Durham: Duke University Press, 2016
Kahn, Andrea. and Burns, Carol. “Why site matters.” Site matters: Strategies for uncertainty through planning and design edited by Kahn, Andrea and Burns, Carol. p.1-13. London: Routledge, 2020
Mann, Charles. The Wizard and the Prophet. London: Picador, 2019
Marot, Sebastien. Taking the country’s side, Agriculture and Architecture. Lisbon: Ediciones Polígrafa, 2019
Marxt, Lucas. “Imperial Valley (Cultivated run-off).” Hamburg: Blinkvideo Media Art, 2018
McLuhan, Marshall. and Fiore, Quinten. The Medium is the Massage. London: Penguin Books, 2008
Morton, Timothy. “The Mesh.” Environmental Criticism for the Twenty-First Century. edited by LeMenager, Stephanie. Shewry,
Teresa. and Hiltner, Ken. p.19-30. New York: Routledge, 2011
Munck-Petersen, Rikke and Farsø, Mads. “Resonance and Transcendence of a Bodily Presence: How a filmic mapping of nonvisual, aural and bodily relations in space can strengthen the sensory dimension in landscape architectural design.” Architecture
Filmmaking edited by Troiani, Igea. and Campbell, Hugh. Bristol: Intellect Ltd, 2019
Secchi, Marialessandra and Voltini, Marco. “They do it with layers - How design by layers is killing urban complexity.” The drawing in Landscape Design and Urbanism, OASE (Issue 107) p. 74-87. Rotterdam: nai010, 2020
Van Bergen Kolpa Architecten. REBEL. Wageningen University and Research. SWECO and Grootscholten Consultancy. Werkboek Oostland. Den Haag: Greenport West Holland, 2020 https://greenportwestholland.nl/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ Werkboek_Oostland_digitaal_feb20.pdf
Van der Hoorn, Melanie. Spots in Shots - Narrating the built environments in Short Films. Rotterdam: nai010, 2018
